Exploring 
  the Use of Dynamic Geometry Manipulative Tasks for Assessment
  Arthur Man Sang Lee 
  amslee@hku.hk 
  The University of Hong Kong 
  
   Ka-Lok Wong 
    klwong3@hkucc.hku.hk 
    Faculty of Education 
    The University of Hong Kong
    Kwok-chun Tang 
    kctang@hkbu.edu.hk 
    Education Studies 
    Hong Kong Baptist University 
    China
    
 
Abstract
 This paper 
  discusses the potential use of dynamic geometry environment to examine quantitatively 
  students? understanding of geometrical knowledge through their performance 
  in manipulative tasks. Most of the studies on the impact of dynamic geometry 
  computer environment tend to focus on students? performance in open-ended 
  explorations or problem solving tasks by means of detailed observations, analysis 
  of individual works and in-depth interviews, aiming to understand the nature 
  of geometric investigations or explorations afforded by the interactivity possible 
  in such environment. A different focus of study is proposed here, which considers 
  dynamic geometry environment as a means to assess students? geometrical knowledge 
  based on an analysis of their responses made quantifiable in specially designed 
  manipulative tasks. These tasks elicit students? responses to mouse dragging 
  of points in pre-constructed dynamic figures. Students? prior knowledge of 
  how to use dynamic geometry software is not assumed. Their responses will be 
  described by and recorded as a prescribed parameter value designed for each 
  task. This will give a set of data describing a range of students? performance 
  on tasks specifically designed to assess students? conceptions of certain 
  geometrical knowledge. The design of these manipulative tasks is explained, 
  with some examples from a recent computer-based mathematics contest for Secondary 
  1 students. Responses to these contest items illustrate a range of outcomes 
  while students attempt to adjust continuously geometric quantities, such as 
  length, angle and area, to complete the required configurations. Further analysis 
  of the distribution of these responses in some items reveals the nature and 
  varieties of approaches adopted by the students. This will lead to considerations 
  of developing the tasks into diagnostic tests.   
 
 |