Abstracts
for the Track
of Invited Speakers as of September 10 |
|
||
|
|
||
Abstract for 21784 |
|
||
Sketching Graph of Function using Software |
|
||
Authors: VLADIMIR NODELMAN |
|
||
Affiliations: Holon Institute of Technology |
|
||
|
|
||
One of the typical tasks in the study of
functions is sketching of their graphs. The acquired skills, as well as the
ability to read graphs, are notably useful in the later life. |
|
||
|
|
||
Abstract for 21785 |
|
|
Multiple-choice questions in Mathematics: automatic generation,
revisited |
|
|
Authors: Kosaku Nagasaka |
|
|
Affiliations: Kobe University |
|
|
|
||
The multiple-choice question is one of very common assessment
tools in the e-learning environment. Especially in mathematics learning, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Abstract for 21786 |
|
|
||
GeoGebra Reasoning Tools for Humans and for Automatons |
|
|
||
Authors: Zoltan Kovacs, Tomas Recio |
|
|
||
Affiliations: The Private University College of Education of the
Diocese of Linz, Institute of Initial Teacher Training, Universidad de
Cantabria Santander, Spain |
|
|
||
|
|
|||
We present two recent tools, integrated in the dynamic mathematics program GeoGebra, for automated proving and discovering in elementary geometry. First of all, the GeoGebra Discovery module, with the Relation, Prove, ProveDetails and LocusEquation commands. They are for humans because it is a human who must introduce the objects the human person wants to Relate, the thesis the human wants to Prove or the missing hypotheses the human wants to discover with the LocusEquation command. Moreover, we will describe some tools we have developed within GeoGebra for automatons, such as the Discover(X) and the WebDiscovery. We conclude the paper with reflections on the pros and cons and on the potential impact of these reasoning tools in the educational world. |
|
|
||
|
|
|||
Abstract for 21788 |
|
|
Group Testing Estimation Using R |
|
|
Authors: Md Sarker |
|
|
Affiliations: Radford University, Radford, VA 24142, USA |
|
|
|
||
Group testing (pool testing) has long been used in public health
applications for monitoring and detection of infectious diseases. In group
testing, pools comprised of individual specimens (blood, swabs, etc.) are
tested initially, and then individuals from positive pools are tested
subsequently for case identification. This procedure and its variants can
offer an enormous amount of cost savings in testing cost. Unfortunately,
group testing data are naturally complex, and the statistical methods that
model the data are complicated. Consequently, using group testing models in
practice is non-trivial, especially for the public health officials who do
not have much background in statistics. Recognizing this as an important
issue in surveillance programs, we develop a user-friendly R package called groupTesting to estimate disease probabilities from group
testing outcomes. The package provides R functions with a great deal of
flexibility and generality for group testing problems, with both single and
multiple infections. Computing efficiency of the R programs is greatly
enhanced by using compiled FORTRAN subroutines. The work is illustrated using
simulation as well as chlamydia and gonorrhea data collected from the
Nebraska Public Health Laboratory. |
|
|
|
||
Abstract for 21790 |
|
|
Use of silent video tasks in the mathematics classroom |
|
|
Authors: Bjarnheiur Kristinsdottir, Zsolt Lavicza, Freyja
Hreinsdottir |
|
|
Affiliations: University of Iceland School of Education,
Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria |
|
|
|
|
|
Starting with an innovative idea from mathematics teachers and
teacher educators in a Nordic-Baltic collaboration project, Bea has designed
and developed silent video tasks and their instructional sequence within a
design-based research project in Iceland. Silent videos are 2 minutes long animated video clips, showing
mathematics dynamically without sound or text. In a silent video task,
students get to add their voice-over to a silent video, either by creating a
screen recording or by recording a sound file. First, the teacher chooses a
silent video displaying some previously studied mathematical topic and shows
it to the whole class. Next, students get assigned into pairs to view the
video as often as they want whilst they prepare and record their voice-over
to the video. Students are free to choose what they include in their
voice-over, but one can expect some explanations, descriptions, or
narratives. All students' responses to the task get listened to and reflected
on in a whole group discussion. Teachers can highlight some shared knowledge
present in students' responses. Also, topics such as precision in language
use and misunderstandings can be addressed and discussed. Results from the design-based research study indicate that
silent video tasks can be used for formative assessment. Teachers can gain
insight into students understanding and students get an opportunity to share
and become aware of their own knowledge about the mathematical topic shown in
the video. Furthermore, it was observed that during implementation of the
silent video task, students would participate in the discussion and talk
about mathematics with their peers. This was also the case in classrooms
where students normally worked silently and individually on problems from
their textbooks and were not used to participating in discussions about
mathematics. |
|
|
|
||
Abstract for 21794 |
|
|
Safety zone in an entertainment park: envelopes and Maltese Cross related to an offset of an astroid |
|
|
Authors: Thierry Noah Dana-Picard |
|
|
Affiliations: Jerusalem College of Technology |
|
|
|
|
|
There exist different, not totally equivalent, definitions of an
envelope of a parameterized family of plane curves. Using software, it is
possible to explore the different approaches, either via geometric
constructions and automated commands or using analytic methods. In this
paper, we explore examples using joint work with a Dynamic Geometry System
(DGS) and a Computer Algebra System (CAS). Each package provides its own
contributions, and together they contribute to the exploration, to obtain
parametric presentations and implicit equations on the one hand, and to have
benefit of automatic animations and mouse-driven dynamic work on the other
hand. Zooming and increasing precision of approximations are crucial. We
study an envelope of a family of circles centered on an asteroid, i.e. an
offset of this asteroid, and explore its physical meaning to determine a
safety zone of a concrete device. |
|
|
|
||
Abstract for 21797 |
|
|
An overview of the evolution of DGS in the 21st Century: it is
time for algebra |
|
|
Authors: Eugenio Roanes-Lozano |
|
|
Affiliations: Universidad Complutense de Madrid |
|
|
|
|
|
The early dynamic geometry systems (DGS): Cabri Geometre and The
Geometer's Sketchpad were introduced in the early 90s, providing a whole new
world of possibilities for geometric exploration. They were manly oriented to
education, but can also be used for research. At the end of the 90s the DGS Cinderella was introduced,
including the possibility to work in non-Euclidean geometries. It also
performs the internal computations in the set of complex numbers, what is the
key for the continuity of some animations. In 2001 GeoGebra is presented as another classic DGS. But it has
a difference with respect to the previous ones: it is free and is willing to
be extended through the collaboration of the community of users. It becomes a
great success. A possible evolution of DGS is moving from 2D to 3D. Some
present a 3D version (Cabri 3D), others include 3D possibilities from a
certain version onwards (GeoGebra) and others are developed directly as a
3D-DGS (Calques 3D). But the most fruitful development is the approach of DGS to the
possibilities of computer algebra systems (CAS). CAS have two main
characteristics: they can handle unassigned variables, that is, variables in the
mathematical sense, not in the computational sense, they work by default in exact arithmetic, instead of in floating
point arithmetic (what makes numerical computations reliable). Already back in 2001 the author detailed in a plenary lecture at
ICTMT-5 the need for cooperation between DGS and CAS: DGS should incorporate
algebraic capabilities. Different approaches have been followed in the 21st
century: a new DGS that has a small internal CAS and/or can communicate
with an external CAS is developed (GDI, Discovery, Geometry Expressions), a computational bridge between existing DGS and CAS is built
(paramGeo , paramGeo3D), an existing DGS incorporates algebraic capabilities from a
certain version onwards (GeoGebra). The last step of this evolution is the autonomous work of the
algebraic engine of the DGS for automatic theorem proving and discovery
(GG-ART). These evolutions have clearly made DGS much more powerful tools. |
|
|
|
||
Abstract for 21799 |
|
|
Recognizing the Polish Efforts in Breaking Enigma |
|
|
Authors: Rick Klima, Neil Sigmon |
|
|
Affiliations: Appalachian State University, Radford University |
|
|
|
||
The work of British and American codebreakers led by Alan Turing
at Bletchley Park in breaking the Enigma cipher machine during World War II
has been well-documented, and rightfully recognized as one of the most
extraordinary achievements of the human intellect. However, without the
success of Polish codebreakers led by Marian Rejewski in the 1930s on an
earlier version of Enigma, the work by the British and Americans in the 1940s
might have taken much longer, prolonging the war at the potential cost of
untold additional lives. The mathematics integral to the Polish method for
breaking Enigma involved some basic theory of permutations. The purpose of
this paper is to present an overview of these ideas and how they served to
this effect. To assist in demonstrating this, technology involving Maplets will be used. |
|
|
|
||
Abstract for 21800 |
|
|
Synergistic relationship between computational and mathematical
thinking: Implications for teacher education programs |
|
|
Authors: Jonaki Ghosh |
|
|
Affiliations: Lady Shri Ram College, Delhi University |
|
|
|
||
The invention of the computer has changed the
way we think about mathematics teaching and learning. Papert, in the early
1960s, had referred to the computer as a mathematics speaking being and had
proposed that children be encouraged to use the computer as an object to
think with. He talked about computer cultures, and delved into how working
with computers can influence thinking and reasoning. His pioneering work led
to concretizing the term computational thinking (CT), which, in recent times
has been identified as an important skill to be developed in children right
from the school years. While CT encompasses a broad skill set applicable
across contexts and domains, it is also intimately connected with
mathematical thinking (MT). The ability to deal with challenging problems,
representing ideas in computationally meaningful ways, creating abstractions
for the problem at hand, breaking down problems into simpler ones and
engaging in multiple paths of inquiry are some of the skills common to both
CT and MT. Thus mathematics as a compulsory school
subject, becomes the natural playing ground for integrating CT based
activities in the K -12 curricula. However, developing appropriate tasks,
which elicit both CT and MT in students continues to remain a key pedagogical
challenge and teacher preparation needs to address this aspect. Mathematics
courses in teacher education programs (TEPs) generally cater to school
mathematical content and related pedagogy. However, they do not offer any
opportunity to specifically address CT. This talk will focus on the synergistic relationship between computational thinking and mathematical thinking by illustrating examples of CT and MT integrated tasks from school mathematics as well as from outside school mathematics. The suggested tasks, both mathematically and computationally rich, were integrated in a foundational mathematics course in an undergraduate pre service teacher education program. The students who attended the course were from diverse backgrounds in terms of their mathematical ability and interest. Their prior mathematical knowledge taught at the senior secondary level in school, such as, permutations and combinations, probability, trigonometry, coordinate geometry and calculus. The integrated tasks covered a wide range emerging from Fractal explorations, Chaos game, coin weighing problems and cake cutting algorithms. The talk will highlight the potential of such tasks to enable students to engage in the processes of visualization, recursion, iteration, scaling, generalizing, forming decision trees and analyzing algorithms, which are important from both computational as well as mathematical perspectives. Evidence of progression in students' thinking as they engaged with these tasks and their positive feedback led to a convincing argument for integrating such tasks in the mathematics courses of the program. The supporting role of technology in mediating CT and MT was also an important take away from the study. |
|
|
|
||
Abstract for 21803 |
Designing Mobile Apps to Address Mathematical Gaps in the
Context of a Developing Country |
Authors: Ma. Louise Antonette De Las Penas, Debbie Marie
Verzosa, Jumela Sarmiento, Mark Anthony Tolentino, Mark Loyola |
Affiliations: Ateneo de Manila University, University of
Southern Mindanao |
|
Developing countries typically do not perform well in
international benchmarks of mathematics achievement. This may be partially
explained by students� immersion in classrooms characterized by superficial
strategies or rote-learning methods. This paper reports on the design of
mobile applications (apps) developed by the authors as part of an ongoing
project funded by a national government agency and intended to promote
structural thinking and statistical reasoning. It describes the general
features of the apps, as well as the pedagogical principles upon which the
apps� designs were anchored on. These principles are grounded on research and
established practices on number sense and statistical learning.
Collaborations with the Philippine Department of Education for widespread
implementation and sustainability are also discussed. |
Abstract for 21809 |
|
|
Browser Based Mathematical Modelling With GXWeb and WolframAlpha |
|
|
Authors: Philip Todd |
|
|
Affiliations: Saltire Software |
|
|
|
||
The combination of Geometry Expressions with commercial CAS
systems such as Mathematica or Maple make a formidable tool kit for
mathematical exploration and modelling. However, these systems are not
appropriate for casual use, as they require installation, and are not free.
In this paper, we demonstrate the use of the free browser-based version of
Geometry Expressions: GXWeb , along with the free browser based CAS tool
WolframAlpha. Both have taken great strides to enhance usability, while
retaining the power of their underlying technologies. We root the discussion
in an investigation of the Tschirnhausen cubic, the curve which appears as
the catacaustic of parallel oblique beams of light impinging on a parabola.
We highlight techniques for moving information between GXWeb
and WolframAlpha and for exploiting WolframAlpha's permissive approach to mixing mathematics
with natural language. |
|
|
|
||
Abstract for 21810 |
|
|
A Haskell Implementation of the Lyness-Moler''s Numerical
Differentiation Algorithm |
|
|
Authors: Weng Kin Ho, Chu Wei Lim |
|
|
Affiliations: Nanyang Technological University |
|
|
|
|
|
This paper describes a computational problem encountered in
numerical differentiation. By restricting the problem to a proper subclass of
differentiable functions, a numerical solution first proposed by Lyness and
Moler is considered and implemented in the functional programming language
{Haskell}. The accuracy of the calculation of the numerical derivative using
the Lyness-Moler's method crucially lies in our recursive algorithm for
computing contour integrals. |
|
|
|
||
Abstract for 21812 |
|
|
Technology use in secondary mathematics education: A comparative
perspective with international large-scale assessment data |
|
|
Authors: Christian Bokhove |
|
|
Affiliations: University of Southampton |
|
|
|
||
In the past decades technology has been used in mathematics
education in a variety of ways, ranging from LOGO in the early days of the
computer, to Computer Algebra Systems and now, among other applications, for
dynamic geometry and online applications. Not all applications of technology
are successful, though. Recent meta-studies have shown that especially
intelligent tutoring systems or simulations such as dynamic mathematical
tools were significantly more beneficial than other uses. In many cases, the
effectiveness increased if digital tools were used in addition to other
instruction methods and not as a substitute. These two developments provide a
compelling challenge to classroom resource; on the one hand, there are the
existing classroom resources like textbooks, and on the other hand there is
technology that can augment and improve these existing instruction methods.
Both could be combined in digital mathematics books, but for this to happen,
several stars must align, not in the least the general technology uptake for
secondary mathematics education in a country. |
|
|
|
||
Abstract for 21814 |
|
|
The Role of Technology to Build a Simple Proof: The Case of the
Ellipses of Maximum Area Inscribed in a Triangle |
|
|
Authors: Jean-Jacques Dahan |
|
|
Affiliations: IRES of Toulouse |
|
|
|
||
We know that there is a unique ellipse inscribed in a triangle
and passing through the midpoints of its sides. This ellipse is known as the
Steiner ellipse. Among the properties of this special ellipse, one states
that it is the ellipse of maximum area inscribed in a triangle. The first
complete proof of this property was given in 2008 by Minda and Phelps. Their
proof uses lots of properties of complex numbers and especially the complex
forms of some transformations. When I read this proof for the first time, I
was unpleasantly surprised by its complexity. From this moment, I worked on
an approach of this property using dynamic geometry and Computer Algebra
System. My aim was initially to find investigations that could lead to this
property. I was successful but what was astonishing is that I could build a
proof of this property following the stages of the previous investigations.
This paper will describe first, how the investigations conducted with
technology led to the expected conjecture and secondly how a simpler proof
could be built in translating with CAS the stages of the investigations
([1]). This process is really unusual because, it is known that there is a
gap between the conjecture and the proof in an experimental process of
discovery mediated by technology (or not). The story of this research will
give an example of bridging the stage of conjecture and the stage of proof
([2]). We will also have the opportunity to show how the possibilities of a
software can influence our constructions and the way to conduct our proofs:
here we will conduct a backward reasoning which is the core of the
simplification provided by my proof. As usual in any research work, we will
give some extra results met during our investigations (construction of all
ellipses inscribed in a triangle, simple constructions of isoptics). |
|
|
|
||
Abstract for 21820 |
|
|
The geometry of impossible figures |
|
|
Authors: Alasdair McAndrew, Jacob Baker |
|
|
Affiliations: Victoria University, Melbourne Australia,
Mathematics Department Alexandra Park School Bidwell Gardens, London N11 2AZ
UNITED KINGDOM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
"Impossible figures" are those that can be drawn with
perspective in two dimensions, but cannot exist in the physical world. Well
known examples are the Penrose triangle, the Penrose staircase, and the
`impossible trident'. The Dutch artist Maurits Escher (1898--1972) took great
delight in such figures and incorporated them into many of his works. Less
well known is the Swedish artist and graphics designer Oscar Reutersvrd
(1916--2002), who drew and developed hundreds of such figures, and who has
been honoured by some Swedish postage stamps showing his designs. Some art
installations now include such figures, but which only seem impossible from
one particular perspective. In this article, we explore the geometry of such
figures, and discuss how such figures can be drawn using standard programming
tools. The mathematics required is elementary, but not |
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract for 21823 |
|
|
NetPad: Using Technology to Promote the Reform of Mathematics
Education |
|
|
Authors: Hao Guan, Gang Yao |
|
|
Affiliations: Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu |
|
|
|
||
With the development of computer technology, the dynamic
geometric system is constantly innovating. From the perspective of application
scenarios, we divide it into three main development stages: application
stage, Internet stage and mobile Internet stage. In the mobile Internet
stage, the positioning and coordination of different devices and the
organization and sharing of digital resources are major challenges. NetPad is a dynamic mathematical digital resource
platform conceived and developed in the mobile Internet stage, and includes a
two-dimensional and a three-dimensional dynamic geometric system. Examples
will be given to illustrate the functions, interaction methods and main
application scenarios of its dynamic geometric system, resources and
platform. |
|
|
|
||
Abstract for 21824 |
|
|
Computational thinking as habits of mind for mathematical
modelling |
|
|
Author: Keng Cheng Ang |
|
|
Affiliations: Nanyang Technological University, 1 Nanyang Walk,
Singapore 637616 |
|
|
|
|
|
The growing interest in computational thinking and its use in
problem solving had led teachers and educators, as well as other researchers,
to ponder over what it means and how best to introduce such a notion to
students in schools. Many ideas on teaching computational thinking have also
been suggested, and in many countries, courses on coding have been made very
popular as more people begin to believe that the ability to write code is an
important skill in this increasingly digital world. In this paper, we focus
on the habits of mind that are related to computational thinking and that can
be developed from learning to code. Some of these habits include looking at
trends in data and analyzing them, examining a process and simulating it, and
systematically constructing a solution to a problem. More specifically, we
shall discuss how these habits of mind can enhance and support one's skills
and competencies in the context of mathematical modelling, using three
examples. Individually, each example illustrates some aspects of
computational thinking applied to the modelling tasks. Collectively, through
these examples, we attempt to demonstrate that the related habits of mind of
computational thinking, developed through coding exercises, could strengthen
one's ability and expand one's capability of tackling modelling tasks in a
significant, albeit sometimes subtle way. The paper concludes with a brief
discussion on possible directions of work that could further exploit
computational thinking in mathematical modelling. |
|
|
|
||
Abstract for 21825 |
|
|
How important is the user-interface to dynamic software? |
|
|
Authors: Douglas Butler |
|
|
Affiliations: iCT Training Centre (Oundle, UK), Autograph-Maths |
|
|
|
||
Autograph is now free to download, thanks to La Salle Education
and "Complete Maths, so joins Desmos and Geogebra on the give-away
table. This is a useful opportunity to compare the three very different
user-interfaces, and to evaluate their effectiveness. |
|
|
|
||
Abstract for 21826 |
|
Maple in the Classroom: Strategies, Experiences and Lessons
Learned |
|
Authors: Douglas Meade, Paulina Chin |
|
Affiliations: Maplesoft, University of South Carolina |
|
|
|
Interactive applications that demonstrate mathematical concepts
are valuable tools for students, whether they are used in a classroom setting
or for self-study purposes. Instructors can easily find a large number of
ready-made applications for a variety of subjects. However, sometimes you
need to build your customized interactive resources. |
|
|
Abstract for 21827 |
|
Understanding Geometric Pattern and its Geometry (part 3) Using Technology
to Imitate Medieval Craftsmen Designing Techniques |
|
Authors: Miroslaw Majewski |
|
Affiliations: New York Institute of Technology, Abu Dhabi Campus |
|
The medieval artists produced incredibly complex geometric art
using very basic tools: a ruler, simple compasses and a number of templates
drawn on a parchment or on a paper. This was all what they had and all what
they needed. They did not have computers, AutoCAD or printers. Nowadays with
all the modern tools we still have problems with reconstructing correctly the
old geometric art and our easy-to-use tools do not help much. |
|
|
Abstract for 21829 |
|
|
|
Exploring Locus Surfaces Involving Pseudo Antipodal Points |
|
Authors: Wei-Chi Yang |
|
Affiliations: Radford University |
|
The discussions in this paper were inspired by a college
entrance practice exam from China. It started with investigating the locus
curve that involves a point on the given curve and a pseudo antipodal point
with respect to a fixed point. With the help of several technological tools,
the problem leads author to explore 2D locus for some closed curves. Later, we investigate how a locus curve can be extended to
finding the 3D locus surfaces on surfaces like ellipsoid, cardioidal surface
and etc. Secondly, we use the definition of a developable surface (including
tangent developable surface) to construct the corresponding locus surface. In
robotics it is well known that antipodal grasps can be achieved on curved
objects. In addition, there are many applications already in engineering and
architecture about the developable surfaces. We hope the discussions
regarding the locus surfaces can inspire further interesting research in
these areas. A lot of interesting graphs and animations will be demonstrated,
the lecture can be understood by anyone who has basic mathematics content
knowledge from undergraduate level. |
|
|
Abstract for 21832 |
|
|
|
What's in a name? Using a scientific calculator for
mathematical exploration in schools |
|
Author: Barry Kissane |
|
Affiliation: Murdoch University |
|
This
paper identifies a problem that calculators are often interpreted as devices whose
sole purpose is to undertake numerical calculations, with the result that
their educational significance in secondary schools is not understood well,
in contrast to other forms of ICT, for which the software capabilities are
recognized as the key features. It is suggested that the potential for
educational use of calculators in many Asian contexts is undermined by this
limited understanding of their capabilities. An important use of calculators
in secondary schools beyond mere calculation involves mathematical
exploration, which is described in the paper. Several examples of ways in
which features of scientific calculators might be productively used for
mathematical exploration are outlined, to indicate the range of contexts of
relevance. Ways in which such features might be used in schools are
described. |
Abstract for 21834 |
|
|
|
Maths in the Time of
Corona: Experiences in Remote Education |
|
Authors: Dora Szego;, Ildiko Perjesi-Hamori, Gyorgy Maroti |
|
Affiliations: University of Pecs, Faculty of Engineering and
Information Technology, Department of Engineering Mathematics |
|
|
This presentation reflects on the spring semester of the
2019/2020 academic year. The COVID-19 global health crisis has brought traditional
university education to a halt. At the University of Pecs we had eleven
days to make the transition to remote education. In trying to overcome the
obstacles some new methods were developed to teach Mathematics in the
Department of Engineering Mathematics: Microsoft Teams, Zoom, Mobius TA, Neptun, Unipoll or even YouTube
were utilized. The presentation covers the experiences of Mathematics for
Information Technology 2 in detail: how the classes were held, the kind of
homework given, the structure used for grading, and most importantly how
Mobius TA was used in the final exams. Computer aided test and assessment is widely used to support the
teaching and learning of mathematics [1, 2]. During the design of the
questions Bloom's taxonomy [3] was taken into account
(the levels are knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis,
evaluation). All questions' title refer to the taxonomy level. Phases of development: 1. Planning: what, to whom, at which level. Detailed development
of curriculum 2. Data acquisition: selection of the types of exercises,
splitting the exercises into parts, weighting, finding the correct wording,
correct answer 3. Programming, close teamwork between curriculum developer and
IT expert. 4. One-by-one testing 5. Construction of different assessments for different purposes
(practicing, self-regulation, exam) 6. Collecting feedback from students and teachers, revision of
questions. In our presentation, the results of students with and without
on-line test and assessment will be discussed. Our goals were -for students: assessing their own knowledge of a particular
topic, -for teachers: getting feedback from the level of knowledge
of learning material. References: [1] Winkler, S., Korner, A., Breitenecker,
F.(2016). A New Approach Teaching Mathematics,
Modelling and Simulation Proceedings of the 9th EUROSIM & the 57th SIMS,
416-419, Oulu, Finland, DOI: 10.3384/ecp17142416 [2] Ronning, F., (2017). Influence of
computer-aided assessment on ways of working with mathematics Teaching
Mathematics and Its Applications 36, 94-107 DOI:10.1093/teamat/hrx001 [3] Pelkola, T., Rasila,
A., & Sangwin, C., (2018). Investigating
Bloom's Learning for Mastery in Mathematics with Online Assessment
Informatics in Education, Vol. 17, No. 2, 363-380 DOI:
10.15388/infedu.2018.19 |
Abstract for 21835 |
|
|
|
Exploring Locus Surfaces Involving Pseudo Antipodal Points |
|
Author: Jen-chung Chuan |
|
Affiliations: Department of Mathematics, National Tsing Hua
University, Hsinchu, Taiwan 300 |
|
In this study, we are to present animations in the form of short
video clips showing how polyhedron A can be changed in appearance to
polyhedron B, where A, B are particular types of Catalan solid, Archimedean
solid or Platonic solids. Since each such transfiguration is in one to one
correspondence with the nets of a particular polyhedron, and since the
algorithm for generating all such nets is yet to be developed, the author
would welcome your feedback on improvements in making a more efficient video
production. |
|
|
Abstract for 21836 |
|
Using technology in mathematics teaching and learning: Sure, but
why and how? |
Authors: Michael Bosse, Anthony Dove |
Affiliations: Appalachian State University, Radford University |
There is little doubt regarding the value of technology in
mathematics teaching and learning. Most research and practices even seem to
accept this unquestioningly. But, is this enough? We must begin to consider
more deeply why and how we use technology in the mathematics classroom. In
this session, we will discuss Instrumental Genesis, Representational
Determinism, Uses of Technology, the IGS framework, and Implications of
classroom implementation of mathematics learning technology. Instrumental Genesis. Instrumental Genesis (IG) recognizes that
a tool (with its constraints and possibilities) and a subject (with his/her
knowledge and work ethic) interact as an instrument through which to do a task
(Artigue, 2002; Lagrange, Artigue,
Laborde, Trouche, 2003; Trouche,
2005). Trouche (2018) recognizes instrumentation as
how the tool affects the subject, instrumentalization as how the subject
affects the tool, and mediation as the interaction of the two. Thus,
discussing either technology or the teacher/students independent of the other
is nonsensical. Representational Determinism. Traditional mathematical
representations include: numeric (or tabular), symbolic (or algebraic),
graphical (or pictorial), and verbal (written or oral). More recently, the
literature has recognized dynamic math environments (DMEs) and dynamic
technology environments (DMEs) as an additional type of mathematical
representation (Brown, Bosse, & Chandler,
2016). All representations have inherent strengths and weaknesses. Any
representation or manipulative provides only a partial embodiment of
underlying mathematical ideas, while ignoring or even slightly distorting
others (Goldin & Shteingold, 2001). In a given
mathematical domain or task, the representation itself not only impacts the
information that can be directly perceived and used, but also limits the
range of possible cognitive actions by allowing some, prohibiting others, and
impacting behavior. (Bosse, Lynch-Davis, Adu-Gyamfi,
Chandler, 2016) The term, representational determinism (Zhang, 1997), defines
how the form of a representation affects: what mathematical information can
be perceived or distorted; what mathematical processes can be activated; and
what mathematical structures can be explored and discovered. Thus, the
selection and use of a representation resides not only in the mathematics
being addressed but also in the determinism of the representation. In order
for representations to be used correctly, users must understand each
representation's associated, contextualized determinism (Bosse,
Lynch-Davis, Adu-Gyamfi, Chandler, 2016). Unfortunately, the seeming
simplicity with which some believe that technology can be implemented in the
classroom can lull some to use technology in means which may lead to lessened
pedagogical and epistemological benefits. Uses of Technology. There are three primary uses of technology
in the classroom: Presentation; Pedagogical (teaching) to teach a concept, to
enhance/extend a concept, to assess student understanding, and to remediate a
concept; Epistemological (learning). These dimensions are very different
applications of technology, and must be thoroughly understood by educators
intending to employ technology in the mathematics classroom. Any plans to use
technology should include more than just a list of activities for students to
perform; plans and activities should be founded upon why it is being used in
such a manner. Interactive Geometry Software Framework. The Interactive Geometry
Software (IGS) Framework considers whether the use of technology acts as an
amplifier (students could achieve the same goals without the technology) or
as a reorganizer (the mathematical goal of the task would be difficult to
achieve without IGS) (Hollebrands & Dove, 2011;
Sherman & Cayton, 2015). Understanding this
framework helps the educator to understand the nature of the activities and
technology use, how students interact with the technology, and what
affordances the technology provides the learner. (Note how this circles back
to IG.) Implications. The implications of these dimensions are myriad
and are important to consider when employing technology. For instance: not
all uses of technology improve learning; technology use in teaching and
learning is not a panacea; and technology use can both improve strengths and
accentuate weaknesses among student learners (Jobrack,
Bosse, Chandler, & Adu-Gyamfi, 2018). References Artigue, M. (2002). Learning mathematics in a CAS
environment: The genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and the
dialectics between technical and conceptual work. International journal of
computers for mathematical learning, 7(3), 245-274. Brown, M., Bosse, M. J. &
Chandler, K. (2016). Student errors in dynamic mathematical environments.
International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning. Retrieved from
http://www.cimt.org.uk/journal/bosse8.pdf Bosse, M. J., Lynch-Davis, K., Adu-Gyamfi, K.,
& Chandler, K. (2016). Using integer manipulatives: Representational determinism.
International Journal of Mathematics Teaching and Learning 17(3). Retrieved
from http://www.cimt.org.uk/ijmtl/index.php/IJMTL/article/view/37/22. Goldin, G. A., & Shteingold, N.
(2001). Systems of representations and the development of mathematical
concepts. In A. A. Cuoco & F. R. Curcio (Eds.),
The roles of representation in school mathematics (pp. 1-23). Reston, VA:
NCTM. Hollebrands, K. F., &
Dove, A., (2011). Technology as a tool for creating and reasoning about
geometry task. In T. P. Dick & K. F. Hollebrands
(Eds) Focus in high school mathematics: Technology to support reasoning and
sense making (pp. 33-52). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of
Mathematics. Jobrack, M., Bosse, M. J.,
Chandler, K., & Adu-Gyamfi, K. (2018). Problem solving trajectories in
dynamic mathematics environments. International Journal of Mathematics
Teaching and Learning, (1) 69-89.
file:///Users/bossemj/Downloads/72-Article%20Text-669-2-10-20180830%20(4).pdf Lagrange, J. B., Artigue M., Laborde,
C., & Trouche, L. (2003). Technology and
mathematics education: A multidimensional study of the evolution of research
and innovation. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick,
& F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education
(pp. 237-269). Springer, Dordrecht. Sherman, M. & Cayton, C. (2015).
Using appropriate tools strategically for instruction. Mathematics Teacher,
109(4). 306-310. Trouche, L. (2005). An instrumental approach to
mathematics learning in symbolic calculators
environments. In D. Guin, K. Ruthven, & L. Trouche (Eds.), The didactical challenge of symbolic
calculators: turning a computational device into a mathematical instrument
(pp. 137-162). New York: Springer. Trouche, L (2018). Instrumentalization in mathematics
education. In the 2018, Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education. Retreived from
https://www.academia.edu/37155584/Instrumentalization_in_mathematics_education Zhang, J. (1997). The nature of external representations in
problem solving. Cognitive Science, 21(2), 179-217. |