Observing Students’ Mathematical Thinking Processes and Collaboration through On-line Windows
Frank Cerreto Frank.Cerreto@stockton.edu
General Studies
Jung Lee leej#stockton.edu
Professional Studies The Richard Stockton College of New Jersey U.S.A.
Abstract
Five years ago, the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM,
2000) presented a vision of mathematics instruction that fosters
learning with understanding by promoting mathematics processes: problem
solving, reasoning and proof, communication, connections, and
representation. Yet, teachers find it difficult to create this kind of
learning environment (e.g., Fennema and Nelson, 1997). Technology can
be used to provide teachers with the tools to carry out this reform
(Kaput, 1992; Becker, 2000; Jonassen, 2000). The purposes of this study
are to examine the ways in which students develop or demonstrate their
understanding of these mathematical processes by utilizing technology
and to evaluate the nature of their on-line collaboration. Using a
course development model they developed (Cerreto and Lee, 2004), the
authors designed and implemented a blended mathematics course for
undergraduate students who are preparing to become elementary school
teachers. In this blended course, computer technology was used to
cultivate the mathematical processes described above. In the classroom,
the instructor used presentation software and Internet resources as
tools for the discovery and discussion of mathematical content, and
students used these tools to share the results of their collaborative
work. Outside the classroom, a Web-based conferencing tool provided a
platform for groups of students to interact and collaborate in the
development of computer-based projects, as well as serving as a center
for other student-student and student-instructor communication. In
order to evaluate student understanding of mathematical processes and
student interactivity, the authors examined transcripts of on-line
discussions as well as computer-based projects. Preliminary findings
demonstrate a rich mosaic of conceptual episodes, ranging from
misconceptions to “eureka” experiences. The authors selected two
student groups for further analysis because they represent two extremes
regarding student work in an on-line environment. The presentation will
include samples of student on-line discussions and projects and an
examination of their connection to course goals, as well as an overview
of the course development model and the course implementation.
|