A Contents review based on the comparison between the contents with CAS system and the contents with general web design tool
Sungwon Myung
floydwon@gmail.com
Youngcook Jun ycjun@sunchon.ac.kr
Computer Education Sunchon National University South Korea
Abstract
In the era of enormous E-learning contents being evolved for the rapid
and effective adaptation to mathematics in education, many researchers
have found some specified facts of interaction for mathematics
education. But there are rarely found for the reason why do sites for
mathematics education have to use the CAS system to represent many
symbols and graphs. This paper aims to show why the contents for
mathematics need to use CAS system by comparing the site developed by
MathView, a CAS system to show mathematical symbols and graphs, to the
site developed by Flash, a typical web design tool. These two are
depicted not by regarding of world wide reputation but by the closeness
of each contents on their course provided. Also, Following the intent
of using CAS system or not, we will establish the classification
results by adapting the taxonomies referred from Johann Engelbrecht et
al, who suggest very effective standards to measure web contents to be
perfectly utilized on the purpose of web based instruction. Based on
the effective way of delivering interactions and contents, we will
provide radar charts for the classification of the two sites on the
matter of the taxonomies provided by Johan Engelbrecht paper.
Taxonomies include dynamics and access measurement, assessment
efficiency, communication, quality and quantity of contents, components
of enriching the sites and independence of the sites. The three former
measurement standards will provide how much do the sites give
interactions to learners. And the latter ones will answer how much do
the sites provide the contents qualitatively and quantitatively. In
addition, we will measure learning strategy on each site. With the
results from the measurement, we will show what aspects are much
effective to whom the contents will be given, and what defects should
be avoided and needs to be updated and developed for the further
adaptation to learners. The result will give core information to
instructors or content designers for a better performance to deliver
the interactions.
|